Eddie Torres
Eddie Torres
Hi there @mugdha-adhav, that behavior is expected and unrelated to the issue being tracked in this thread. Kubernetes intentionally prevents reattachment of volumes marked for deletion: ```sass PersistentVolume is marked...
cc: @jsafrane for review whenever you have some time 🙂
Discussed during sig-storage and we'll want to account for plugins which don't create VA objects / don't support `ControllerPublishVolume` RPC, I'll include that in next rev.
@mowangdk That is a good observation - typically the issue sorts itself out over time assuming the relevant VA object is eventually deleted. However, that is not a great assumption...
cc: @gnufied @jsafrane - PTAL, this is ready for review.
@mowangdk To the best of my knowledge, this PR does not affect CA in any way.
This PR is approved by sig-scheduling and sig-storage, but I believe it should be reviewed and approved by sig-auth as well. cc: @deads2k @dims
/test ci-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-graceful-node-shutdown