Todd Baert
Todd Baert
> sounds good to me and I'm happy to work on it assigned!
> Since now we have the config and flag level metadata, and some of them are required, why can't we have key-value pairs as selector similar to what Kubernetes [has](https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/overview/working-with-objects/labels/)...
Relevant slack discussion: https://cloud-native.slack.com/archives/C03J36ZP020/p1745250924025809
@ericpattison is support for this simple configuration perhaps a missing feature?
Agreed with @beeme1mr ... while this behavior certainly should be correct, it's a known unimplemented feature.
> I am not sure about this one @toddbaert. In the TS world, this is "wrong" in the sense that the type does not declare it as optional, as you...
Draft for now.
One other thing to point out is that [hook data](https://openfeature.dev/specification/sections/hooks/#46-hook-data) isn't widely implemented yet, so we could mark that subsection experimental... however I don't see much risk with it.
> Would it make sense to focus on experimental -> hardening in this PR and work on hardening -> stable in a separate PR? As noted already, the implications of...
I've opened https://github.com/open-feature/spec/pull/315, which based on feedback, I think we should agree on first.