Todd Baert
Todd Baert
Changed from 2.0 to 1.15.0
Thanks @MarkoMlakar !
We tried some benchmarking before and the problem is that GH actions seem too susceptible to noisy neighbor and resource provisioning constraints. I think we'd need self-hosted runners to get...
> [Q] does someone have an idea why the gherkin tests for SYNC_PORT still fail even though I excluded them with ~@sync-port @alexandraoberaigner I pushed [this](https://github.com/open-feature/go-sdk-contrib/pull/799/commits/7d6fff614c420e8b843d62e22ec5df4a6b58528d).
I'll merge tomorrow unless I hear objections cc @guidobrei
> @toddbaert. Last nudge on ruby. Thanks! I'll merge as soon as I [release the provider](https://github.com/open-feature/ruby-sdk-contrib/pull/72).
> Kotlin example: > > var myFlag = OpenFeatureAPI.getClient().getBooleanValue("myflag", ...) > OpenFeatureAPI.observe().onEach { event -> > if(event.eventDetails?.flagsChanged.contains("myflag")) { > myFlag = OpenFeatureAPI.getClient().getBooleanValue("myflag", ...) > } The existing events API is...
IMO this is making a "flagd problem" into an "everyone problem". In most cases, when error hooks run, there is some "Exceptional" circumstance, and, in most cases, and actual exception...
See: https://github.com/open-feature/flagd/issues/1760#issuecomment-3229449507
> I believe this ADR should address this issue. > > https://github.com/open-feature/flagd/blob/main/docs/architecture-decisions/multiple-sync-sources.md No I don't think so @beeme1mr , this is to understand the sync.proto as a means of facilitating...