tnovotny

Any progress on this?

I tried building the vs2019 branch with 16.5.4 and it did not build. I mainly get these two errors. ``` D:\work\externals\cppcoro\lib\cancellation_state.cpp(82): error C2220: the following warning is treated as an...

Ok, after merging in master it looks _much_ better. I still get the ``` error C2039: 'uncaught_exception': is not a member of 'std' ``` which I can fix, and I...

After patching doctest, I at least have some libs I can link against, but one of the tests fails, which in my case is OK for the moment as I...

recompiling with 16.6 doesn't change anything. ``` cake MSVC (x64): C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.26.28801 MSVC (x86): C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.26.28801 ... =============================================================================== D:\work\externals\cppcoro\test\cancellation_token_tests.cpp(261): TEST SUITE: cancellation_token tests TEST...

With all respect to the 'creative solution', readable and understandable code looks different, so something like a `buffer_if` with a predicate seems preferable and should still be considered a reasonable...

see here: [cpp11/SingleInclude/hippomocks.h](https://github.com/dascandy/hippomocks/blob/cpp11/SingleInclude/hippomocks.h)

Hmm, it looks like there is a singleton being used now, so using two repos no longer works. The example is a skinned down example where, due to complex setup,...

For returning move only types, either once is OK or a generator must be used. `Do(...)` can be used for that, so that seems reasonable. Out parameters makes no sense...

Hmm, not sure. I initially thought as an end pipe, but that makes a messier API as you need to pass the operation and the destination. Maybe a better approach...