Thomas Stjernegaard Jeppesen
Thomas Stjernegaard Jeppesen
See: https://github.com/gbif/portal-feedback/issues/539
Needed to implement https://github.com/gbif/portal-feedback/issues/517
When a OTU source dataset (UNITE, BOLD) has a different accepted taxon than GBIF for a parent taxon of an OTU, the OTU ends up as a synonym of the...
Is there actually a genus "Gen" or is it some dirty data that slipped through? ``` { "count": 29406, "verbatim_kingdom": "Animalia", "verbatim_phylum": "Arthropoda", "verbatim_class": "Ostracoda", "verbatim_order": "Podocopida", "verbatim_family": "Macrocyprididae", "verbatim_genus":...
The suggest seems to always place synonyms and doubtful species before accepted species: https://api.gbif.org/v1/species/suggest?datasetKey=d7dddbf4-2cf0-4f39-9b2a-bb099caae36c&limit=10&q=Passer One often ends up on the wrong page when browsing species pages using the suggest. Maybe...
There used to be `taxonID` included here: https://api.gbif.org/v1/species/search?q=Puma&rank=SPECIES&limit=100 They are still here https://api.gbif.org/v1/species?name=Puma%20concolor - but this endpoint offers less filters than the search.
In the backbone, this species hypothesis is not placed under the same parent as in the UNITE checklist: https://www.gbif.org/species/search?q=SH1503845.08FU&advanced=1 The UNITE checklist has been updated recently, so in theory this...
For [this dataset](https://www.gbif.org/dataset/3566822f-2b74-468a-af13-e75651813d3f) we fail to include the mulitmedia extension provided in the source archive. https://api.gbif.org/v1/species/196365408/verbatim
API returns a 404 with `q=Acer%20palmatum` in combination with `hl=true` https://api.gbif.org/v1/species/search/?dataset_key=d7dddbf4-2cf0-4f39-9b2a-bb099caae36c&hl=true&q=Acer%20palmatum Oddly, it works as expected if the author is included: https://api.gbif.org/v1/species/search/?dataset_key=d7dddbf4-2cf0-4f39-9b2a-bb099caae36c&hl=true&q=Acer%20palmatum%20Thunb
3033 occurrences of "Fungus indet." under the kingdom Fungi now snaps to the the genus Agaricus Linnaeus, 1753. This is seemingly because of a match to "Fungus Adanson ex O.Kuntze,...