Thomas Honeyman

Sorry, @shd101wyy, but Halogen does not support fragments. I would like to add fragments to Halogen when I have some time -- fragments are certainly possible to add to the...

@srghma I’m happy to review this and I would love to merge if we can get a nice performance improvement! Do you mind saving any larger refactoring for another time...

@natefaubion @garyb I'm not familiar with this part of the code; do either of you have time for feedback wrt this change? If not, I can also take a little...

I’m not necessarily against splitting out queryF (and the other constructors), but I also don’t think it’s a problem to maintain this separately downstream — I think it’s pretty rare...

I'd be happy to accept a PR adding docstrings to these two functions, and I'm _tentatively_ open to renaming the `Aff.Driver.runUI` function as I doubt it's much-used outside of packages...

I'd like to hear what other maintainers have to say on this one, as it's not a style that I've used myself and I'm not sure what the potential benefits...

Yea, these instances are preserved across core / contrib until 0.15 because it’s a breaking change to remove them (it means losing support for 0.14.0 and 0.14.1). I think it’d...

I’m curious to see this because I have several projects using easy-purescript-nix I have to regularly update. Do you have an existing project somewhere using this?

I think it would be better to wait for 0.14, which implements safe coercions so that we get this for free without using unsafeCoerce (we can use the ‘coerce’ function...

Hmm — I didn’t know about #3890. I would hope that if coerce is meant to be the way to do safe coercions that it would generate the same code...