Thomas Honeyman

Results 39 issues of Thomas Honeyman

With [halogen #705](https://github.com/purescript-halogen/purescript-halogen/pull/705) open, which adds proper support for portals to Halogen, this library is no longer necessary (or a good idea!). If / when that pull request is merged,...

## Summary In #4226 I proposed that we remove the PureScript bundler. If we remove the bundler, then we only use `language-javascript` to verify that FFI declarations have a corresponding...

type: enhancement
purs bundle
type: breaking change

### Summary The `lazy` and `memoized` functions (ie. anything that uses `Thunk` from `halogen-vdom`) can cause slots to incorrectly be created and destroyed when used on HTML containing child components....

bug

This issue proposes adding unique identifiers to Halogen components, along with a possible implementation. Users would be able to retrieve a component's unique identifier via `HalogenM`: ```purs handleAction = case...

halogen-8

Users of current Spago will not be able to use the PureScript registry until they upgrade to a new config format as tracked in #842. However, they can still publish...

When using the `--quiet` flag, Spago doesn't report errors related to Spago (though `purs` compiler errors are still emitted). For example, if you create a fresh Spago project with `spago...

Related to #204 and https://github.com/purescript/registry/pull/140 and depends on the [new registry](https://github.com/purescript/registry/). The PureScript registry supports [a minimal API consisting of package additions, updates, and unpublishing](https://github.com/purescript/registry#the-registry-api). This issue tracks adding a...

new command

As discussed in #218, I think we ought to split out the development instructions for Try PureScript from the main README, and we should expand those instructions to include cutting...

In #199 we discussed the scope of Try PureScript -- what its goals are, what its goals should not be, what sorts of features are acceptable, and so on. The...

document me

I am encountering an unexpected 'free variable' error in formal verification in a module that uses the `zip` function. Potentially related to #1250 but not fixed by #1251. This is...

bug