Thomas Holmes

Any possibility of reviving this? I do a lot of work with veandco/go-sdl2 and would love to have this work.

I tried updating https://github.com/zmb3/gogetdoc/blob/b4c1dcb095da28d1d54e10184a3eddd9b0122f89/main.go#L71 to true, but that wasn't enough. Just made the check very slow and still didn't return a result.

In some ways it replaces a ton of functionality. I've started a repository, but maybe we could look at integrating it if it proves desirable. Otherwise it might make sense...

Sounds good! After getting in further I think it would benefit from being in the same ecosystem as the rest of the core SDL bindings. I've got most of the...

I am using the latest version of Krakow. I don't have debug level errors on at the moment but I can enable them. It's also very challenging to identify when...

I don't know if it helps but I am also experiencing a problem with sidekiq that also looks like a celluloid deadlock. (Same project)

I'm a pro customer so I sent in an email but I'll share anything I learn with you. Right now I'm in the same spot with both problems.

Yeah, that looks like it! On Jul 13, 2014 4:30 PM, "Aaron Raddon" [email protected] wrote: > good point, this is the one you are referring to i think? 07e9ed4 >...

A permissive license would be ideal, but I'm not entirely certain how exactly licensing works when you've essentially re-implemented (probably while referring to the code) other another copyrighted work. The...

Thanks! The convention is to add a file named LICENSE, which I think the github interface can help with that, but it's a bit awkward on a pre-existing repo. https://github.com/thomas-holmes/gterm/community/license/new?branch=master&template=apache-2.0