MichaelTJones
License
Can you please add a license to your repository? I need to fork it to make the RNGs serializable and I cannot do so legally unless it has been licensed under something that allows this modification.
Appreciate it!
oh! sorry. good point. recommended choice?
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 6:44 PM, Thomas Holmes [email protected] wrote:
Can you please add a license to your repository? I need to fork it to make the RNGs serializable and I cannot do so legally unless it has been licensed under something that allows this modification.
Appreciate it!
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/MichaelTJones/pcg/issues/3, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHgypZjqMB9BbdZtt2F9Cq_x2VMo2xJwks5tM_X6gaJpZM4RmGSy .
-- Michael T. Jones [email protected]
A permissive license would be ideal, but I'm not entirely certain how exactly licensing works when you've essentially re-implemented (probably while referring to the code) other another copyrighted work.
The original PCG implementation http://www.pcg-random.org/ is Apache licensed so I imagine that is probably a safe choice.
will do
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 9:21 PM, Thomas Holmes [email protected] wrote:
A permissive license would be ideal, but I'm not entirely certain how exactly licensing works when you've essentially re-implemented (probably while referring to the code) other another copyrighted work.
The original PCG implementation http://www.pcg-random.org/ is Apache licensed so I imagine that is probably a safe choice.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/MichaelTJones/pcg/issues/3#issuecomment-359328130, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHgypdv3aWYbHzsTgaqfEbV4qT_XDUinks5tNBrygaJpZM4RmGSy .
-- Michael T. Jones [email protected]
done.
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 9:27 PM, Michael Jones [email protected] wrote:
will do
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 9:21 PM, Thomas Holmes [email protected] wrote:
A permissive license would be ideal, but I'm not entirely certain how exactly licensing works when you've essentially re-implemented (probably while referring to the code) other another copyrighted work.
The original PCG implementation http://www.pcg-random.org/ is Apache licensed so I imagine that is probably a safe choice.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/MichaelTJones/pcg/issues/3#issuecomment-359328130, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHgypdv3aWYbHzsTgaqfEbV4qT_XDUinks5tNBrygaJpZM4RmGSy .
-- Michael T. Jones [email protected]
-- Michael T. Jones [email protected]
Thanks! The convention is to add a file named LICENSE, which I think the github interface can help with that, but it's a bit awkward on a pre-existing repo.
https://github.com/thomas-holmes/gterm/community/license/new?branch=master&template=apache-2.0
thank you for holding my hand here on the license issue. doing this from bed...nighttime...happy to help...advice most beneficial
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 9:50 PM, Thomas Holmes [email protected] wrote:
Thanks! The convention is to add a file named LICENSE, which I think the github interface can help with that, but it's a bit awkward on a pre-existing repo.
https://github.com/thomas-holmes/gterm/community/ license/new?branch=master&template=apache-2.0
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/MichaelTJones/pcg/issues/3#issuecomment-359331319, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHgypSKgsihZbeKtplWUONmaDTG4QzCFks5tNCGPgaJpZM4RmGSy .
-- Michael T. Jones [email protected]
Haha. Thanks for addressing it so promptly and thank you for the clean pure go implementation. It's been quite useful to me :)
Have a good one!
Great! delighted!
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 10:00 PM, Thomas Holmes [email protected] wrote:
Haha. Thanks for addressing it so promptly and thank you for the clean pure go implementation. It's been quite useful to me :)
Have a good one!
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/MichaelTJones/pcg/issues/3#issuecomment-359332538, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHgypYclHbJmdurDrpSK3KCYr_OJlz4Iks5tNCQZgaJpZM4RmGSy .
-- Michael T. Jones [email protected]
About to incorporate this into one of our libraries, thanks for making this available! This issue can probably be closed now :)
Great!
On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 9:43 AM Richard Artoul [email protected] wrote:
About to incorporate this into one of our libraries, thanks for making this available! This issue can probably be closed now :)
— You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/MichaelTJones/pcg/issues/3#issuecomment-425658582, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHgypXPS0ZtRhKPkuzAVDweOIBg6Tgguks5uf6MegaJpZM4RmGSy .
--
Michael T. [email protected] [email protected]