Tommy Hofmann
Tommy Hofmann
I am adding documentation in #1411 P.S.: But only for `FqField`. No one should spend time on the other finite fields.
It is impossible to define a `copy` method for Nemo matrices with the same semantics. We should probably remove the `copy` method in AbstractAlgebra to make it more uniform.
There is `deepcopy`.
Maybe we need to revisit the decision of trying to be consistent with julia. Same problem with the `divrem`, `div`, `mod`, `rem` nonsense.
Not sure how easy this is. Maybe @fredrik-johansson has an idea.
`x += zero(x)` lowers to `x = x + zero(x)`, which creates a new element and then assigns `x` to this newly created element. You are never changing the object...
First, what you experienced is not special to Nemo types. It happens for all julia types: ```julia julia> function g(x, n) x += n return x end julia> x =...
It is already there, but maybe not under the name that you would have in mind. ```julia julia> Qx, x = QQ["x"] (Univariate Polynomial Ring in x over Rational Field,...
Let's hear what the others think. @wbhart @tthsqe12
This is a about Nemo.