thc202
thc202
For point 2 https://github.com/zaproxy/zaproxy/pull/8524#discussion_r1645384563
Yes, preferable to keep it open.
IMO it's not responsibility of network add-on to decide whether a request should be accessed or not.
First one you already did zaproxy/zap-extensions#6231 the code does need to be tweaked to stop passing the unused parameters when getting the description.
Is the specification available somewhere?
> using a single way of opening URIs is somewhat a bug. No, it's not, the bug is that the platform is not supported. > even though they could with...
Since 2.12 ZAP provides a new class, `ZapHtmlLabel`, to properly render HTML.
Thank you!
What OS are you using? Is Firefox a snap?
I wonder what the value is of merging these inconsistent runs.