Robert Olejnik
Robert Olejnik
I confirm, that here is no error message now that the IP is "taken".
@F1L337 we will plan the new feature for 1.6 - but for now we will fix the no indication issue - here is the bug: https://github.com/DefGuard/defguard/issues/1382
Reletad to: https://github.com/DefGuard/defguard/issues/955
@4lb no - this is completely not what I described and expected. New design is needed.
@wojcik91 counting that the activation and sync process of client - as it also has enrollment in it - will fix as well: https://github.com/DefGuard/defguard/issues/703
Hi, in the mobile client there are settings for that. In the web UI we have not yet enabled it.
The design is done. We plan to rollout new UI in 1.6
@gabrielgunnarsson Thanks for the issue. The problem with making the first/last name optional runs deeper than it might seem - since Defguard supports both external SSO (like Entra) and two-way...
@F1L337 I assume you mean that the login/password fields shouldn’t be visible at all - so users would be forced to use only the SSO button? The problem with that...
@F1L337 ok got it. Thats actually a good idea to have an alternative login by options. But we will add this as an option in settings as well.