Börje Karlsson
Börje Karlsson
@LionbridgeCSII, we'll review this soon. Is the behaviour in this PR now consistent between the default and experimental modes?
Thanks for the contribution, @theolivenbaum! But the build is failing. Can you mark this PR as draft for now? We'll start a review and leave comments soon.
@theolivenbaum, sorry for the delay to get back to you. I'll try to review this one ASAP. We were blocked by other demands.
@theolivenbaum, I've left some initial comments here. Thanks.
To be reviewed soon.
Same for node.js dependency. Trying to move from v14.17.6 to v16.13.0 causes all sorts of problems.
Current solution under "EnablePreview" doesn't handle ambiguous cases.
This is lower priority for now. And the initial implementation would need a config flag (or resolution policy) to toggle between the old value representation and the new one.
@LionbridgeCSII, please take a stab at it after the newly opened issues. This will probably require bigger changes to solve in a more general way. But it would be great...
This is a bit tricky. Please let us know your analysis before changing the implementation. There is a common scenario where people make a mistake on the DOW and still...