Thomas Reynolds
Thomas Reynolds
Any reason you wouldnt just the normal `minify_css` and `minify_js` features?
@Arcovion Whoops, probably my fault when merging the new design.
@joost Our core minifiers work inline. See the commit @Arcovion referenced above. I think this is just a documentation issue.
No, that current functionality isn't available here. We just farm out to the HTMLCompressor Rack middleware. Seems like it should be possible to extend that class with some logic for...
Definitely.
Hmm, we just upgraded the main project to SassC. I wonder if that and sprockets may now be at odds.
@SnijderC Go ahead and roll back your middleman version to 4.2.x
Oh, this is just importing? I misread. I think we should support the normal `_partial.scss` form, but don't need the `.css.scss` version.
The "output" extension, the `css` in `.css.scss` is only required when wanting to output a file. Imports are usually modules, so they don't need/want it, only the template engine extension...
@michaelfeihstel if you don’t need sprockets from JS modules, you can skip this old extension. Sass alone (which is supported directly in MM core) should handle your case above.