Tony Arcieri
Tony Arcieri
I think the solution to the main complaints in this PR is #1900. Though that may not make it into `elliptic-curve` v0.14. We are not going to get rid of...
We’re in the process of making breaking changes to `signature` now, so this change is possible
Edit: see original version of toplevel description for context ~~I think option 2 is probably the most straightforward. It's pretty much where we were before, and we have also added...
`rand_core` v0.9 is out
@rozbb perhaps we can get rid of the `dev-dependencies` of the `kem` crate now that its API has been massively simplified?
I think we can close this issue and track remaining work in #1571
> The current implementation uses MontyParams::new_vartime so it seems like it is vartime for the modulus, but maybe that should be renamed mul_mod_vartime anyway? That's a good point... perhaps there...
@fjarri thoughts on this versus #511?
This splits `Uint::mul_mod` and `Uint::mul_mod_vartime`: https://github.com/RustCrypto/crypto-bigint/pull/623