Sylv
> I added the following to the "Read parchment mappings" test and it seems to work fine, am I missing something or not testing the right method/class? As long as...
I realize what's happening. We need to be testing 1.17 mappings or higher, otherwise it's obfuscated.
This worked for me. It doesn't work with `reorderedMappings` because for whatever reason that strips `GlStateManager` of its method mappings except for its initializers. ```groovy mappings.getClass("com/mojang/blaze3d/platform/GlStateManager") .getMethod("_activeTexture", "(I)V") .getArg(0, 0,...
Unnecessary after deobfuscation, plus this is jank.
This is silly. Does anyone have an alternative driver that's maintained by more than one person? Or maybe a contributing guide so I can help make this usable? Not being...
It could also be an error (if prefixing is off) to not have overwrites.requireAnnotations set to true.
💀 please no
So, I've discovered an issue in the current implementation that severely over-complicates this, and that is the `/effect` command calls `LivingEntity#addEffect` and `LivingEntity#removeEffect` methods. - **So what?** Well, if I...
> why not use threadlocals to pass context down to the remove methods? That has the same issue as changing which methods are called. I don't want to break compatibility...
> > > why not use threadlocals to pass context down to the remove methods? > > > > > > That has the same issue as changing which methods...