Shu-yu Guo

@nicolo-ribaudo We discussed some of your questions on the editor call, our preferences are: 1. We have plans eventually to basically have asynchronous Abstract Closures. For now, since you already...

I think the algorithmic steps here help clarity over tables, especially when reviewing implementations. It'd also be nice to have this be precedent setting as editorial style to not loop...

Nice find, this is definitely a bug. The right fix here is to have SuspendAgent take a mathematical value for the number of milliseconds, but as you point out about...

> First, syntax can be layered on top of Symbol.private, even perhaps the same #-name syntax of the fields proposal. I'm not necessarily opposed to that! Certainly. What I intended...

@Igmat I'd like to to avoid debating the particulars of syntax and alternatives here, but for the record I do like the current `#` name syntax. The intention of this...

@Igmat I don't understand the framing of that question.

> Worse, https://jsfiddle.net/n04m3jpo/ shows a variant with promise handlers (instead of setTimeout's Web IDL callbacks) where Chrome and Safari do run the promise handler, and Firefox does not. That both...

I'll update https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/5722 to follow suit so we have a common mechanism.

Oh boy. That makes me very wary to support such a unification...

I'm trying to wrap my head around the missing parts here if we keep with the forwarding settings object architecture. As I'm slowly doing this Domenic's complexity objections become more...