Sushain Cherivirala
Sushain Cherivirala
Is there any way to get around this limitation?
It also mentions SVN right now which is pretty bad.
Fixes are things that already exist in the manual versions and additions are the rest.
Server logs: ``` apertium@oqaa:~/beta/apertium-html-tools$ docker-compose logs -f --tail 0 apy Attaching to apertiumhtmltools_apy_1 apy_1 | [I 180104 04:01:15 util:82] util.apertium('hi', '/source/apertium-fra-eng', 'eng-fra-morph', 'txt') apy_1 | [I 180104 04:01:16 web:2063] 200...
Honestly, I have no idea. It needs some debugging. @unhammer ?
> But the one file edited in cc47b3a doesn't even exist anymore. The content from it exists in another file.
> I have a feeling we could get rid of jquery.jsonp-2.4.0.min.js altogether and just use the stuff built in to jquery – or what do you think @sushain97 ? I...
> It's the server that has to send the CORS header. And the server is APy (and if APy doesn't send the CORS header, that's a bug that we should...
> But does the dependency actually add anything? What does it do differently from calling ajax with datatype jsonp? Found it: https://stackoverflow.com/a/19207855/1266600
> Do we have a reproducible scenario where jsonp.js adds something? Yes. As mentioned in the link and in jQuery docs, `$.ajax` does not give you HTTP error handling: ...