Cong Pham

> @suneox @Krishna2323 , can you please accept the job and reply here once you have? @mallenexpensify Thank you, I've accepted the offer

## Reviewer Checklist - [x] I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off). - [x] I verified the correct issue is linked in the `###...

## Proposal ### Please re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue. Workspace - System message for workspace description edit shows from "" to "x" ###...

> @suneox, I think I'm a bit lost on this one. Could you please verify if my understanding of the new behavior is correct? > > 1. If a task...

@garrettmknight I’ve reported this issue and have more context on it, so I can support with reviewing the proposal as a C+

This issue cannot be reproduced on the latest staging version `v9.0.72-0`. The current network filter [in video](https://github.com/Expensify/App/issues/53325#issue-2705892354) has `Preserve log` enabled, ensuring that previous requests are retained. So I think...

> @suneox Just checked on dev with Preserve log disabled and the issue is still reproducible. @burczu I’ve just verified on the latest main `v9.0.72-1`, and this issue cannot be...

> Hey @suneox! I'm not sure if understand the issue correctly, but in your video the `OpenApp` request is called every login, which should not happen, based on the description...

@bernhardoj [proposal](https://github.com/Expensify/App/issues/53697#issuecomment-2523165254) LGTM. In this case, we can prevent nested pressables 🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed

> @bernhardoj @suneox can we add unit testing to the proposal? Or list a strong reason why we aren't adding unit tests? See [this slack post](https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C01GTK53T8Q/p1733148961659549) for a reminder on...