Michael Stramel

This feels more like a bug/quirk with the browsers. When I get on tomorrow, I will do some digging and see if this should be fixed upstream. Might also be...

In the case of `?hidden=${true}` or `?hidden=${false}` might be worth a rule similar to `no-useless-template-literals` where the binding would never change and be equivalent to `hidden` or no attribute respectively.

> indeed, could be tricky to check for any side effects. could we start with a `no-this-assign-in-render` or `only-local-assign-in-render` or something? Yeah, I was thinking along the same lines. Perhaps,...

Might make sense to have a setting for excluding/including certain modules where `html` came from?

This would align with the work @43081j and I had discussed related to typos. Would be able to handle lit specific lifecycle hooks and public members. Would be similar to...

@43081j So you want to say a user is incorrect for using something else named `properties`? Even though it is perfectly valid? You are correct that if they want to...

I can see this covering these 2 cases > Checking for the presence of the `@customElement` JSDoc and that the baseClass is not `HTMLElement`, should allow us to assume that...

Approaching 2 years of being open... :/

Any chance you could pull from https://github.com/groovy/groovy-eclipse/tree/master/ide/org.codehaus.groovy.eclipse.refactoring?

Generally, I've stayed away from the wizard-like prompts in the CLI. They often come with ~100-200KB of code just from the library alone. I can look into adding something like...