Christophe Coevoet

Results 2839 comments of Christophe Coevoet

For the *inverse* side of relations, where updating the owning side is required, I think it is a good reason to keep using methods to add and remove things. Trying...

@foolip yes, indeed

The name of the feature in the web-features project is still `invoker-commands`, which is why I used "Invoker API" when submitting it. I'm fine with any name for that scope...

@aik099 I cannot. Only @pamil is owner of this organization.

The case of tracking changes for mutable value objects has never been supported by the ORM ever since 2.0. It always required you to clone the object before mutation and...

If we bump the min version of Behat, this will indeed be seamless for users.

the existing workflow fails, so we need to fix things in 2.x, not in 3.x only.

See my previous comment there: https://github.com/FriendsOfBehat/MinkExtension/pull/38#discussion_r2631956512

I suggest bumping the min version instead of doing conditional calls. It makes the code simpler

You should probably also update the dumpers to add a comment with the documentation URL (when present), so that `debug:config` and `config:dump-reference` show it.