Stijn Moreels
Stijn Moreels
For the other issue about logging levels: we could indeed look into that more after we have established a baseline for reading the configuration in Serilog. To be clear on...
Let us know if you come across any problems. We'll hold off with our review until this PR is out of construction 😉 . Ps.: Oh, and a good tip...
> One of the things that would make testing locally easier is if someone could provide me their appsettings.private.json, could that be arranged? :) I think you only need the...
Couldn't this be fixed already with singleton registration in the dependency container, where the same instance is injected in the message handler(s)? The message pump works with a reactive receival...
> I think it would be good if we could just discuss this in a separate 30 min meeting. Yes, we could do that. 👍
This will maybe made easier once we introduced the message handlers.
Like we talked about offline. What if we used the context filtering of the message handling to determine which step to use, and provide in the specific Azure Service Bus...
Hmm, we may want to hold on with this so we can first migrate to the `Azure.Identity` and therefore the new `Azure.Messaging.ServiceBus` package. That would mean that we can use...
Hmm, with the current setup, you could already to that yourself (a bit), as the router is registered in the dependency injection container, you could retrieve it in your custom...
The message router needs to have a `ServiceBusSender` instance, so it may be good to have this injected, and for that, we may want to use the injected stuff for...