stap-m
stap-m
I think we added this as comment because we wanted to wait for a solution for composed units. This needs some discussion.
This might be solved by #1911 EDIT: or not... We'd need a kind of "relational unit", not just a quantity value.
> As `energy` now will become a `quantity value` the mental distinction between `energy` and `energy amount` becomes obsolete. I therefore suggest to relabel `energy amount value` to `energy value`...
> Regarding energy storage I suggest the following: > * Add a class `stored energy`: _A stored energy is an energy that is contained in an energy storage object._ >...
We should proceed with this issue. - I'd be ok with relabelling `energy amount value` to `energy value`, if we keep the original label as alternative. - Is there an...
@nelekoehler @l-emele any comments?
> I see here a consensus to use `energy value` as main label and `energy amount value` as alternative label. So that is ready for implementation. @madbkr can you implement...
I agree that we should discuss the order. Especially, I think that "publication" should be the last tab. But I also think that it makes sense to describe the general...
> I would opt for a slightly different order, arguing for having the scenarios first, before filling in their details (sectors, models..) I'm fine with that, too.
@adelmemariani can you collect the missing terms and open an issue in the [OEO repo](https://github.com/OpenEnergyPlatform/ontology) please? We should add the missing terms soon.