stap-m

> Alright, i will change the labels of the instances of `nature of uncertainty` to `ambigous uncertainty`, `epistomological uncertainty` and `ontological uncertainty`. Let's keep the `uncertainty of ambiguity` etc as...

Could you please link the new issues here. With the PR, you don't have to wait for theses issues. We can integrate them later.

> If these terms are to be defined separately, we are mainly missing the relations between model and the aspects of uncertainty. > `has quality` is already pre-established. Should we...

And with `location of uncertainty`, I thought about an entity with an equvalence axiom like `'has role' some 'location of uncertainty role'`.

> Should we also add a relation like `has uncertainty`(_A relation between a `model` and an `uncertainty` that indicates the model departs from complete determinism_)? > Should `uncertainty` be related...

> _A relation between a `model`(x) and a `nature of uncertainty`(y) that indicates uncertainty within x is caused by y_ `has uncertainty level` "caused" is misleading here, its not a...

> After further discussion with @stap-m and @ColinHDev we came to the decision, that we can use e.g. `nature of uncertainty` as a quality of a quality, as long as...

> Other option: define our own term tracker item and replace IAO:0000223 with our own. Sure. Maybe we can even combine our own annotation and the proper usage of IAO:0000223....

From latest oeo-dev 79: - discussion: - only URLs as range and no longer plain strings: this may be a lot of work - we have many URLs to add...

I like the proposal. I don't think we should restrict it to the usage within OEO, esp with respect to new energy ontologies. What about: _A term tracker annotation is...