André Staltz

Yeah I think I'm ok with the idea of `Object.assign(element, props)` and `element.onflipend = fn`. Just to understand why you proposed this, is it just to avoid translating `onFoo` to...

@robdodson Yeah that's aligned with what I think as well. > Just speaking personally, knowing the trade off between an event name heuristic and having to define setters for everything,...

Yes, I agree with everything Rob said. Could still bikeshed on the name for `domEvents`, but before that we need to know what @sebmarkbage thinks about that.

> it seems to us that React will have to do nothing new to support web-components interoperability in both ways Well, that's not anything new. As most frameworks, nothing needs...

As a reminder, could we reconsider `onFoo` => `foo` conversion? Before we went deep into props vs attrs, Sebastian said: > The only concern would be if we should have...

It should

Hey zebulonj. The packages use ES6 which should be supported by all modern browsers without transpilation. You can see that this repo doesn't really have any other code than just...

I think UglifyJS is missing some opportunity here, because arrow functions have potential of minifying code even better. What about Uglify ES? I mean, overall by now we should be...

Have you considered forking? :)

I understand, but callbags is a project built to be fragmented. It's a good thing, I've worked a lot on concentrated projects and they suffer from trying to be everything...