Dominique Schuppli

Hi @fndejan, no, noone is working on this right now. This (or something very similar) has been requested before, so please be aware of https://github.com/moq/moq4/issues/173#issuecomment-347695892. I can definitely see the...

This has been slightly defused by 233063e1. What's more, this invalid usage pattern is probably an edge case that's unlikely to cause much trouble in real-world applications. On the other...

@airbreather, I can't promise that I'll reach a different conclusion than four years ago, but I'll take a look at that code soon.

We'll have to be very careful not to create a leaky abstraction. * Allowing users to state that they want a repository to use a separate proxy generator only makes...

@bclothier, some quick questions: * It appears it's possible for your add-in to be notified when VBA execution starts. Correct? * If so, is the use of `AppDomain`s an option...

I'd like to suggest the following changes: * Let's make sure a `MockSequence` itself has `Verify[All]` methods. * If `mock` partakes in a `MockSequence`, and it is the only mock...

@udlose: > 2. i'd argue that an exception should be thown if only one Mock is [placed] into a MockSequence I guess for consistency's sake with my third bullet point?...

Closing this dormant issue, but marking it as "unresolved" so it can be easily found again. Please see #642 for details. If you'd like to pick this up and work...

Thanks for your willingness to work on this @weitzhandler. I have to say, however, that ambient sequences (the API approach taken by the 3rd party package Moq.Sequences) can be problematic...

> I'm not sure which one you're referring to. The one that's been discussed in the latter half of this issue, where you register mocks with a sequence object, then...