Sebastian Rittau
Sebastian Rittau
In principle I like the idea of a warning message, but I didn't want to complicate the CI scripts for now.
That's what I meant by "includes". I.e. the type itself or - if it's a union - one of the union members must be equivalent to the regex group.
In the future we could also compare the gdb version against the version we specify in `METADATA.toml` to make sure they match.
Thanks for contributing! Unfortunately, [as outlined in our CONTRIBUTING document](https://github.com/python/typeshed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#standard-library-stubs) we only accept pull requests to the standard library for future Python versions after the first beta version has been...
If it works and is in use, we should probably add this to our stubs. Looking at the CPython code, that this works looks incidental, but changing it on CPython's...
It looks that this particular instance of tests was run on the old Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, which is why an old gdb version was used.
Personally, I would prefer not to define this - at least for now. I'd expect this to mainly be a fallback clause when something starts to break (like now with...
That sounds fine to me.
I've marked this as deferred for now, pending the outcome of python/cpython#109601 and python/cpython#109714.
While we could try an exploratory PR, I suspect that adding `None` will be very disruptive.