Sriramkrishnan Muralikrishnan
Sriramkrishnan Muralikrishnan
> @mohsensadr Instead of passing the RegionLayout, we could change to just pass the domain bounds. I don't know if RegionLayout is explicitly needed. @srikrrish may know more what is...
I am done with my comments. But it seems this branch may still have some conflicts that need to be resolved.
The last commit still doesn't fix the issue. Basically I observe two issues for the problem `srun ./PenningTrap 32 32 32 655360 400 FFT 0.01 LeapFrog -b 1.0 --info 5`...
Thanks a lot @mvictoras for making this interface and the PR. Does it already include the Catalyst stuffs from @jhgoebbert ? It definitely includes some but I am not sure...
With https://github.com/IPPL-framework/ippl/pull/448 (ii) and (iii) are fixed. I no longer also don't see (iv) from the CI compilation tests. But I missed one more warning from unit tests as I...
Thanks for the link. I am not sure why it should be host only as looking at the page it seems `infinity_v` should work. I will give it a try.
Next week I will be in the parallel-in-time conference in UK and hence won't be joining the Monday meeting and IPPL meeting but yes we can discuss it on Monday...