Soutaro Matsumoto
Soutaro Matsumoto
Yeah, it's not supported at all. ``` Class.new(klass) do include Ext::InstanceMethods end ``` The code requires a concept of _type of a class object which includes a module_... I don't...
Good point! I decided to use `RubyVM::AbstractSyntaxTree` because it's included MRuby and doesn't require additional dependencies. One option would be to make `prototype` commands an external library and uses `parser`...
Oh sorry, I mixed CRuby and MRI... It's great to me too if `AbstractSyntaxTree` is stable and portable. I think showing a better error message and exit gracefully is the...
I don't think printing error messages is the best solution for this. Contributions for improvement are welcome.
Okay. Reopening this issue. (I don't think I have bandwidth to do this for a while, but someone else would have!)
Hi @st0012! Yes, I know the situation and I want GitHub to support RBS files! There are two things we have to do according to the steps: 1. We need...
> based on GH there is 139 public repos Good point. I agree that the syntax would be worth being supported. > I thought it's already defined? Anyway, I need...
I don't want to add a new line with `arg0`, while I don't want to fix all of the existing code. If you change an existing line and Sider says...
I think this is an issue of Steep. (And I was thinking I have implemented the _spread_... Will take a look.)
Spreading tuples onto block parameters is not supported by Steep as of 1.0. I've been working for better multiple assignments, which will ship in Steep 1.1, and will work for...