Peter Solnica
Peter Solnica
How about a more verbose `is_eql?(foo)` and `not_eql?(foo)`
Closing in favor of #98
>> document how to create a custom injector with options > What did you mean by this, @solnic? This could be skipped (unless you feel like it's worth the effort)...
@vitaly-pushkar we can skip it for now
> Only one thing is puzzling me: the difference between Plugin and Provider Packs. @jodosha a plugin *extends dry-system itself* to enable more functionality, a provider pack gives you components...
I'd merge this in already and then follow-up with another one that zeitwerkifies dry-system's own requires. WDYT?
How about `interface?(:foo)` - it would be consistent with dry-types where we have `Types.Interface(:foo)`
I'd be OK with either `interface?` or `method?` too.
Ah yeah, I guess `includes?` wasn't a good choice either 😬
I'm gonna go with `interface?` because we already have `Types.Interface` in dry-types so this would be consistent.