softworkz
softworkz
I came here to ask exact the same question. I implemented support for an IR remote control receiver and it worked out pretty well. Though, I've been under the impression...
> > I implemented support for an IR remote control receiver and it worked out pretty well. > > Can you provide more information about this project? I'd like to...
> This behavior depends on the device. The problem is we don't want to persist permissions for devices that can't be reliably re-identified after restarting the browser or reconnecting the...
> Essentially, we don't need to know whether the device is there or not. We just need to make sure that users get the opportunity to activate and use it...
This is the output I get for the device from the tool (already had it installed :smile: ): ``` =========================== USB Port3 =========================== Connection Status : 0x01 (Device is connected)...
Yea, it seems that just the subdevices are unnamed.
Thanks so much for your support!
If anybody would need such device for dev or test, I can organize that.
@nondebug - Hi, I've seen there hasn't been much progress on the product name issue. We have completed a Windows app with a WebView2 and would rather use the WebHID...
Any update on this? Thanks