softwaremaverick

That would be easy enough to do and I doubt anyone would complain. Although you should probably make it protected as opposed to public since you'll only use it in...

Just realised you said protected already so never mind :-) Just submit a commit with your changes and someone will be right with you! On 17 February 2015 20:12:48 GMT+00:00,...

I'm just pleased to see the modular approach to robospice is seeing a lot more usages. On 17 February 2015 20:14:33 GMT+00:00, Andrew Clark [email protected] wrote: > Just realised you...

My first time was a learning curve too. Check out GitHub starter guide for details. It's well worth it! On 17 February 2015 20:30:42 GMT+00:00, Igor Zubenko [email protected] wrote: >...

Best way is to create a new branch from master. Then submit that for pull request. That way you can make more branches from master with different pull requests On...

Yes but part of Android scheduling nothing to do with robospice. On 6 October 2014 18:08:31 BST, alexandru-pinzaru [email protected] wrote: > --- > > Reply to this email directly or...

As an exercise I recommend you look at doing the changes as cleanly as possible as it should be relatively straight forward (ish). As a clue look at the addRequest...

Could i suggest that it should be onListenerAttached instead of request found. This way it sounds more typical of similar concepts. .

We're waiting for you to implement the change! :-) On 7 October 2014 04:47:09 BST, fikr4n [email protected] wrote: > So, how is the development of this issue right now? Will...

I wouldn't want to see this either as if i remember rightly the spice service listener now supports detecting when all requests are finished anyway doesn't it? Then implement something...