softwaremaverick

Yes please. I also agree that it is quite complete and only minor enhancements would be required for further flexibility. On 29 July 2015 18:46:51 BST, "Stéphane Nicolas" [email protected] wrote:...

Thanks! :-) On 29 July 2015 22:06:26 BST, "Stéphane Nicolas" [email protected] wrote: > @softwaremaverick, you've been added. ;) > > 2015-07-29 11:40 GMT-07:00 softwaremaverick [email protected]: > > > Yes please....

Quick review seems OK except there's a null check before an instanceof check which effectively makes the null check not required. However, I'll check out the bits that call it...

Looking through the rest of the code your changes seem to be aligned with the existing code in that region so it's good with me. Whilst the change means an...

Yes that's correct. Maybe Stephan will know of a scenario why it was added. If it's for safety reasons then I'd prefer the code that adds listeners to prevent nulls...

@mignick I was just glancing through these changes again as I noticed they've not yet been merged in for some reason. However, looking at PendingRequestListenerWithProgressStub I noticed that the request...

Yeah I don't mind doing it where I can. I'm trying to get back into doing Android development but haven't done it in a while. There's definitely a few minor...

Yeah check out UncachedSpiceService if its still named that. It contains a different cache manager. Andrew On 5 March 2015 09:37:01 GMT+00:00, SjoerdvGestel [email protected] wrote: > When executing an request...

That'll be the one! :-) On 17 March 2015 11:21:07 GMT+00:00, SjoerdvGestel [email protected] wrote: > Hey! Thanks for your reply... > The SpiceService im using in this case is extending...

Personally I'd create a custom request which connects through the Apache http client and saves the result somewhere. On 6 May 2017 00:49:36 BST, Julio Lemus wrote: >Hello, > >I...