Sergio Moya
Sergio Moya
How we can do it?
Hi @GeraldLoeffler! It has been a while since you created this RFC-0. Do you wanna champion it?
Please correct me if I'm wrong @derberg, this is our first minor version release. Meaning we should make some decisions on how we want to approach this. In order to...
> looking at the list, I would ask is it worth the effort if we have 2.5 scheduled for September, so 1.5 month away For me, it is worth it...
> I think it's very unlikely we'll have an **urgent** patch release to do in the future. The spec shouldn't have such urgency IMHO. Dunno, not worth the effort for...
@char0n your assumption is correct. Closing in favour of https://github.com/asyncapi/spec/issues/830.
Nice Issue @Crain-32! 🥇 💯 I want to take a moment to clarify some concepts (to myself) and give a thought to how STOMP protocol bindings could be defined in...
> @smoya What about using something like `ws+stomp` as the protocol? I thought about that possible solution but then we would need to somehow extend the STOMP bindings from the...
> so yeah, primary is `WebSocket`, and `subprotocol` is its feature, so sounds to me like we need: > > * new field in websocket binding > * stomp, wamp...