smartie2076

If you need inspiration for the pytests, you can find a lot in https://github.com/rl-institut/multi-vector-simulator/, folder `tests`. It should be somewhat a similar structure. Also, I think that #92 already shows...

Hello @remmyd! Haven you been able to work on the pytests since my last, short review? If you let me know if this PR is still up-to-date I can do...

We should discuss this further in the openmod forum, as there are new answers.

I have closed the PR #118 now, as I want the electrolyzer to be implemented differently: Not based on checking the asset´s name only, but rather by defining a new...

No, he is not in charge anymore. We will for now go with a simple transformer, to which two inputs have to be added (water, electricity). Due to issue #186...

The electrolzer model is very simplified right now, and the question stays how we can improve this. One way, for now, would be to optimize with the simplified model, but...

Hello @minhki95 the feedback function in the EPA is working now, please use that to give bug reports to the EPA from now on if possible. @c-moeller if you intentionally...

You can look into the function for this - [here](https://github.com/rl-institut/multi-vector-simulator/blob/dev/src/multi_vector_simulator/C1_verification.py#L193) is the equation that is applied: ``` # If energy production asset is a non-dispatchable source (PV plant) if (...

> > > If you want to avoid this locally, go to `C1_verification.py", line 224` and replace `raise ValueError(msg)` by `logging.error(msg)` I would also like this to be done in...

@Bachibouzouk I think there is no argument for it. @ciaradunks this might be an easy entry into the MVS. If you run into issues, @TheOneAndra already uses a local fix,...