smartie2076
smartie2076
I was thinking maybe we did not normalize the maximum capacity as well - but we somehow did: https://github.com/rl-institut/multi-vector-simulator/blob/18bec98ef405d4ba0097b5188ffbb5e375ef6271/src/multi_vector_simulator/D1_model_components.py#L979-L982 However, I am not 100% sure that this if-loop is correct,...
Did you test for timeseries of 1?
@Bachibouzouk what I tend to do in these situations is look at the LP file. The maximum capacity is defined explicitly there, as is the timeseries. So basically you can...
> I found out that the discrepancies between MVS and open_plan are due to results processing (open_plan now uses the direct output from oemof-solph and thus there is no rectification...
Hi @Bachibouzouk! Tried to follow your notes, but I think I am a bit confused. > In an oemof-solph model by setting the pv with fix=0.5 for all timesteps (that...
Okay, then you confirmed the reason why we implemented the feature like this. 👍 @Bachibouzouk: Does that mean that you think that the weird PV capacities that you identified in...
This is more an issue of "None" being used as "NaN", but not as an actual value. There is currently nothing that checks the validity of input parameter values, and...
Connected to #586
@Bachibouzouk did you close this as well with #586?
@SabineHaas @ciaradunks maybe you can also dicuss this one, at least the oemof side of this?