Sylwester Arabas comments

Results 518 comments of


                                            Sylwester Arabas

update Macports gdl Portfile (currently 0.9.9)

For the record: PR to bump to 1.0.0-rc1: https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/6340 PR to bump to 1.0.0-rc2: https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/7091

package suggestion on Debian arm64 is little wrong for GraphicsMagick

Thanks, just to confirm, do you suggest changing it to "libmagick++-dev or libgraphicsmagick++1-dev" to point out that either ImageMagick or GraphicsMagick are OK?

Error during make install when installing gdl 1.0.1 in Ubuntu from source files

> I fail to see why a link woudl be created ina s source tree that must remain without spurious files. https://github.com/gnudatalanguage/gdl/pull/1247

ImageMagick 7 unsupported

It is built into CMake itself: https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/module/FindImageMagick.html (https://github.com/gnudatalanguage/gdl/issues/417)

ImageMagick 7 unsupported

> New in version 3.9: Added support for ImageMagick 7.

Enable serialization of Prognode instances

I'm worried that the only thing that was ever written on these matters is the HACKING file: https://github.com/gnudatalanguage/gdl/blob/master/HACKING

1.0 RC: build failure on ARM 32 bit

Would it then make sense to add it to GDL CMake default linker flags?

move to "GPL v2 or later" or "GPL v3"?

@gnudatalanguage/gdlpackagers IUUC, it appears we have at least one unnoticed license incompatibility - with GLPK which is GPL v3, while GDL is GPL v2. Any opinions on which is best...

move to "GPL v2 or later" or "GPL v3"?

BTW, this concerns GDL, GDLDE as well as gdl_kernel (which up till how had no license specified, see https://github.com/gnudatalanguage/gdl_kernel/issues/12)

move to "GPL v2 or later" or "GPL v3"?

Apologies, false alarm. In fact it seems that the source file headers in GDL do mention "(at your option) any later version"