Slavfox

Cozette does not contain that glyph. You have Bitstream or something on your system, and fontconfig is falling back to that.

Cozette is almost certainly never going to have "actual" emoji support - it's just way too massive for me to implement reasonably, as the solo dev working on the font....

It would take quite a lot of work. Cozette, right now, has 857 glyphs, and I draw all of them by hand. While some of those wouldn't need to be...

As much as I'd like to, this isn't really possible for me to work around _easily_ - glyphs in bitmap fonts are bolded by the terminal, by redrawing the glyph...

This seems to be an application-specific quirk (I'm using xterm to grab the images). I've found no workaround for it yet, other than redoing the build system entirely to not...

Marking as wontfix, since it seems to be an xterm bug.

Closed by [5969f39](https://github.com/slavfox/Cozette/commit/5969f399ede018266952f98f926d3e2c7347fd81)

Readability should come first, staying within the character box and keeping margins second, and consistency third. In other words, I aim to try and obey the margins and bounding box...

I'm worried about the `U`s with different baselines -  The glyph should've been shortened vertically to make the accent fit, rather than moving it down a pixel.

I just took another look at the glyphs and I realize now it's not possible to shorten some of them without moving them down. Given the choice, I'd rather keep...