Slava Krutelyov
Slava Krutelyov
type tracking
I'm a bit lost in this thread discussion. Isn't explicit use of `std::abs` in our coding rule? Shouldn't the related unit test change from `abs` to `std::abs`? Or is there...
ah, this is just about large values of track pt. I misread as if there were NaNs and infinities when in [gitlab 40](https://gitlab.cern.ch/cms-nanoAOD/xpog-coordination/-/issues/40) I suggested to open an issue here....
> You're going too fast for me ; are you saying that 40TeV track are physical ? yes. well, at least within uncertainties. What does the `ptError()` return for these...
> What does the `ptError()` return for these tracks? > If it comes out below 20% or so, I'd be motivated to follow up. actually, compare `qoverpError()` with `charge()/p()` to...
are you rediscovering that the first piece of code calling to the `boost::spirit` brings most of the cost?
type tracking
looks like bot is asleep/broken
> looks like bot is asleep/broken jenkins console is showing smth like:
> DQMHistoTests: [Total failures: 370](https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/baseLineComparisons/CMSSW_14_1_X_2024-07-31-2300+42d9d6/63837/validateJR.html) Looking at 141.046_RunEGamma2023D , the only DQM difference is in the dzError comparisons between the original track and the packed cand: this looks somewhat as...