skq-5233

Why is there no quantitative comparison output when I run evaluate.py?Looking forward to your reply. Thank you!@bertjiazheng

> Hi, @DRAhmadFaraz, I have got the predictions of PlaneNet, but the per-pixel recall seems to be lower than that in the paper. Can you reproduce the evaluation in the...

Hello, when I run python evaluate.py, I do not know what the reason is and do not output quantitative results such as rel, rmse, etc. I hope you take the...

> Hey, when I run the evaluate.py, I only got the prediction of PlaneNet. > What can I do to get the results of other existing methods ?? @jcliu0428 @bertjiazheng...

> @HanochZzhou @bertjiazheng Can you show your gt" results screenshot.? > let me help you then. Hello, when I run python evaluate.py, I do not know what the reason is...

> Hello, I'm confused about the `python evaluate.py` output result >  > what does this mean? > Emm, where should I find the recall ? > @bertjiazheng @art-programmer Thanks...

> Hi , > when I run the evaluate.py , There is only " gt" result , no "prediction " result .What code should I modify to get the "prediction"...

> They are random. The order of planes doesn't matter since I used the matching loss. Great work! when I try to train the network an error shows up: NotFoundError:...

> @MrCrazyCrab sorry it took me so long to answer, but could you solve your problem? > > I could solve it with this: > > Besides taking "-D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0" parameter...

> @MrCrazyCrab sorry it took me so long to answer, but could you solve your problem? > > I could solve it with this: > > Besides taking "-D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0" parameter...