Alex
Alex
Can you please clone [play-scala-starter-example](https://github.com/playframework/play-scala-starter-example), checkout 2.5.x branch and test whether updating files in the `public` directory reloads application? > Is the Assets versioning in routes file the key problem...
Okay, so no `--- (RELOAD) ---` message here, as expected. Now you need to add webpack/typescript to the starter project in a similar way to your actual frontend setup. >After...
> What is the resolution on this? We have the same issues. Does 2.6 fix this? Either somebody provides a repro or it's never going to be fixed. Note the...
> Oh, you mean this doesn't happen to everyone? Do you see _everyone_ complaining? There are 3 people _from the same organization_ and that's about it. That strongly indicates an...
After staring at [sbt-optimizer](https://github.com/jrudolph/sbt-optimizer) output a bit and `inspect`ing task dependencies, that double compilation looks pretty straightforward: [playReload](https://github.com/playframework/playframework/blob/000c8e50293c647a14b24781ebad8d47d69e60fe/framework/src/sbt-plugin/src/main/scala/play/sbt/run/PlayReload.scala#L16) -> playCompileEverything -> playAssetsWithCompilation -> [web-assets:assets](https://github.com/sbt/sbt-web/blob/1.3.0/src/main/scala/com/typesafe/sbt/web/SbtWeb.scala#L304) [playReloaderClasspath](https://github.com/playframework/playframework/blob/000c8e50293c647a14b24781ebad8d47d69e60fe/framework/src/sbt-plugin/src/main/scala/play/sbt/run/PlayReload.scala#L19) -> Runtime / exportedProducts ->...
@dispalt Try setting `WebKeys.exportedMappings in Assets := Seq()` in build.sbt.
@schmitch Sure, go ahead. I initially thought that setting might break webjar-based Play projects (I've never used webjars myself), but I haven't been able to think up any failure cases.
On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 10:18 PM Matthieu Volat ***@***.***> wrote: > or I'm missing something? > Yes, readme.
No, nothing is launched sandboxed, which is noted right in the readme.
1. For whatever reason doing anything with xhost was never necessary for me, so I didn't bother. And, yes, it's supposedly enabled: ``` % xhost access control enabled, only authorized...