Shane Utt

Oh I didn't realize Flynn needed this (the description was empty! there wasn't an issue for it!). I'll go chat with him about it, if this unblocks him then I...

So yeah I talked with Flynn and all his development/testing is done on ARM64 systems so unblocking a community member is a great reason to continue. I did realize however...

Everything else looks good. Just the build trigger changes and the follow up for runners and then LGTM.

This feature has been accepted for the `v1.4.0` release. Please see [this announcement](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/gateway-api/discussions/3824) for more details, and for the timing expectations for transitions. Note that if the timeline can not...

The initial GEP phase for the experimental target for `v1.4.0` has ended, and this is now merged as `Provisional`. The next step is working on the implementation details and moving...

Note that we've updated our timeline to change the next transition (the "How?" transition where implementation details are at least ready for review) by 1 week, to be due on...

Moving this one out of `v1.4.0`, as we previously agreed that we would do this one at a later time, but peel out #3949 for `v1.4.0`.

Hi @izturn, thanks for your request! :wave: I understand that fundamentally what you'd like to be able to do is have a **field on Gateway listeners** to explicitly declare a...

While refining our backlog we saw that this one was open for a long period of time without anyone available to champion it. We're going to close this as we...

I've talked about this with @robscott and @youngnick. They are not in favor of the "checkpoint" approach to moving forward, as they feel there are some things in this PR...