David Seddon

Hi Daniele, thanks for opening this issue! It's interesting, the original intention of `ignore_imports` was to provide a list of temporary exceptions that constitute technical debt - so they're meant...

Hi Artem, Thanks for your question! It should be possible, but you might need to add an `__init__.py`under `tests` to make sure it's a package. Your `.importlinter` might look something...

> The main reason I'm bringing it here is to avoid the transition of the test suite into a package. I want to follow pytest best practices. Interesting. What is...

I see... Very interesting, I've not thought about tests like that before. I'll have a think about what the best thing is for import-linter.

Hi Iago, thanks for the feature request. A good way to go with this, I think, is to have a configuration option that allows modules to be ignored (currently you...

Great - let me know if you need any pointers.

You've discovered a bug! I've been able to reproduce this and have added it as an issue here: https://github.com/seddonym/import-linter/issues/45 In the meantime, the workaround is just to redeclare the fields...

Hi @kasium - thanks for reaching out. I'd be happy to review a PR from you if you have capacity to move this forward - might be easier to start...

Simple wildcards I think. See https://docs.python.org/3/library/fnmatch.html. Have a look too at [my comment on the other PR](https://github.com/seddonym/import-linter/pull/46#pullrequestreview-239198215).

> So for which fields to you see this feature? Let's stick to `ignore_imports` for the time being. Since we now make a copy of the graph for each contract,...