sean-brydon

> Tested this and worked fine but it swaps both the event types instead of moving only one. is this fine @ciaranha? > > Screen.Recording.2024-04-24.at.2.08.42.PM.mov Yeah I was testing this...

[https://www.unkey.com/blog/fixing-serverless-with-a-vps](https://www.unkey.com/blog/fixing-serverless-with-a-vps) Was speaking to the unkey team about tinybird and they send me this - good read

Deffo not a "fixed by" but alexs PR [https://github.com/calcom/cal.com/pull/14904](https://github.com/calcom/cal.com/pull/14904#pullrequestreview-2043336312) does a great job at fixing some perf here @emrysal

Ill take this and [CAL-3086](https://linear.app/calcom/issue/CAL-3086/give-org-owners-the-ability-to-lock-availability) next week

@ciaranha - can you checkout preview for this PR - code looks good on my end.

@Jaibles how should we approach locking Availability? I dont think it as simple as locking event type creation

@shirazdole How do we give the admin a choice for the availability if its on a public event? Not entirely sure the flow here myself

Do you think you can explain more what you mean by the issue? Maybe i am not understanding something

Isnt this just managed event types? or do we not allow that with availability?

> @sean-brydon can you explain more a bit or can post a screen cap/video of this? Hi - what i mean is our "Dialog" component should be swapped out for...