Scott Marlow

@lukasj do you expect that we will try to make further Persistence 3.2 test changes like https://github.com/jakartaee/platform-tck/pull/1309 which is for this challenge?

Impacted 3.1 tests (for EE 10 Platform TCK testing) would be: com/sun/ts/tests/jpa/core/derivedid/ex1a/Client.java#DIDTest_from_appmanaged com/sun/ts/tests/jpa/core/derivedid/ex1a/Client.java#DIDTest_from_appmanagedNoTx com/sun/ts/tests/jpa/core/derivedid/ex1a/Client.java#DIDTest_from_pmservlet com/sun/ts/tests/jpa/core/derivedid/ex1a/Client.java#DIDTest_from_puservlet com/sun/ts/tests/jpa/core/derivedid/ex1a/Client.java#DIDTest_from_stateful3 com/sun/ts/tests/jpa/core/derivedid/ex1a/Client.java#DIDTest_from_stateless3 com/sun/ts/tests/jpa/core/derivedid/ex1b/Client.java#DIDTest_from_appmanaged com/sun/ts/tests/jpa/core/derivedid/ex1b/Client.java#DIDTest_from_appmanagedNoTx com/sun/ts/tests/jpa/core/derivedid/ex1b/Client.java#DIDTest_from_pmservlet com/sun/ts/tests/jpa/core/derivedid/ex1b/Client.java#DIDTest_from_puservlet com/sun/ts/tests/jpa/core/derivedid/ex1b/Client.java#DIDTest_from_stateful3 com/sun/ts/tests/jpa/core/derivedid/ex1b/Client.java#DIDTest_from_stateless3 com/sun/ts/tests/jpa/core/derivedid/ex2b/Client.java#DIDTest_from_appmanaged com/sun/ts/tests/jpa/core/derivedid/ex2b/Client.java#DIDTest_from_appmanagedNoTx com/sun/ts/tests/jpa/core/derivedid/ex2b/Client.java#DIDTest_from_pmservlet com/sun/ts/tests/jpa/core/derivedid/ex2b/Client.java#DIDTest_from_puservlet com/sun/ts/tests/jpa/core/derivedid/ex2b/Client.java#DIDTest_from_stateful3 com/sun/ts/tests/jpa/core/derivedid/ex2b/Client.java#DIDTest_from_stateless3 com/sun/ts/tests/jpa/core/derivedid/ex3a/Client.java#DIDTest_from_appmanaged...

https://github.com/jakartaee/platform-tck/pull/1334 is for Persistence 3.1 + Jakarta EE 10 Platform TCK

Any Persistence 3.2 test excludes should be done by updating the `tckrefactor` branch: - Add excluded tests to doc file jpa/docs/TCK-Exclude-List.txt - Update test methods to use org.junit.jupiter.api.Disabled @Disabled @Test...

The staged https://www.eclipse.org/downloads/download.php?file=/ee4j/jakartaee-tck/jakartaee10/staged/eftl/jakarta-persistence-tck-3.1.5.zip contains an update for this TCK challenge.

Thanks @pferraro for this update! The JPA changes look good to me. It looks like the EJB distributed stateful session beans should work the same in terms of ensuring that...

@markt-asf are you okay with releasing a new Servlet 6.0.2 TCK zip that has been changed to use a web-app_5_0.xsd for one test? The related discussion is on https://github.com/jakartaee/platform-tck/issues/1313 and...

https://www.eclipse.org/downloads/download.php?file=/ee4j/jakartaee-tck/jakartaee10/staged/eftl/jakarta-servlet-tck-6.0.2.zip is the TCK to be staged when this pr is marked ready for review.

Thanks @markt-asf! sounds like this draft pr should be closed and that a new Platform issue should be opened for the next Jakarta EE 10 Platform TCK update to re-examine...

I couldn't build this locally as I get failure with command ` mvn -X clean install -Dmojarra.version=4.0.5`: > There is a process already using the admin port 4,848 -- it...