Scott Chamberlain
Scott Chamberlain
Try this instead `install.packages("taxa", repos="https://dev.ropensci.org")` should install a binary version of the version here on github and get around the XML problem
Good question @arendsee I still have not thought much about how the two compare. A few thoughts after having a quick look: - not sure about the beta vs. alpha...
Love that xkcd ---- wrt `taxlist` submission: We do have some pkgs in ropensci that are somewhat overlapping, but usually not this close as `taxa` and `taxlist` are. Our editorial...
okay, seems pretty easy, since `check_for_pkg("taxize")` was already in one place where it was used, and i've put it in the other place used in branch `taxize-compat-changes` (see commit above)
cool idea! would it require a bunch of dependencies?
that sorta makes sense i think, if you're going to break out a new pkg focusing on plotting, then might make sense to put this fxn in that pkg
i think it makes sense to store in a consistent way. as what's returned, I lean towards No. 2, an object, but I haven't played with either to see what...
That plan sounds good @zachary-foster - i'll have a look at the changes as used in taxize dev branch to see if it creates any issues
@zachary-foster any idea of when this will get some attention?
awesome, thanks