Emma Schymanski
Hi @Adafede - yes they are grouped by name, it looks like this might be a tautomer edge case, since they have e.g. the same PubChem CID but have different...
I sent some input via email - I also dug up [this](https://photos.labwrench.com/equipmentManuals/4131-1344.pdf) for the outstanding entry:
Confirmation received from Takaaki-san that this is QqQ: > Matsuura, Fukuyama University LC-ESI-QqQ-MS/MS 285 spectra > Table 2, Horai et al 2010, DOI [10.1002/jms.1777](https://doi.org/10.1002/jms.1777)
I don't quite understand what the developmental advantage is of changing the file ending instead of the name of the file? Surely this will potentially create more problems than it...
Sounds better to me - no veto from my side.
> One point that i find wierd is that the validator seems to not like the Accession strings You can find the details about how to construct the Accession IDs...
> I have opened an issue for asking help. > > I will be away for one week (holidays) so I will continue working on this later on. Please note...
@meier-rene @sneumann is it true that the SPLASH in MassBank is calculated on the normalized intensity? This should not be the case, we should be using the absolute numbers otherwise...
Thanks @PaulThiessen - as a follow-up, is there any way currently that @meier-rene could validate that the SID provided is your preferred SID for records like this? Then we could...
The validation is probably not currently designed to handle these special case formulas yet so don't worry about failing that for now - this will be something we can hopefully...