sby1ce

Hello. `imageproc` currently has 2 template matching methods, sum of squared errors (SQDIFF) and cross correlation (CCORR), as opposed to OpenCV's 3 methods, which also has correlation coefficient (CCOEFF). Saying...

The macro that generates the benchmarks for template matching ignores the `method` parameter and uses hardcoded SQDIFF. https://github.com/image-rs/imageproc/blob/ab9e19c241844996dfe0758a0e2f9e893b793142/src/template_matching.rs#L853-L866 Also cross correlation is not benchmarked at all. Perhaps I'm misunderstanding how...

Hold lotto spin button QoL for faster rolls

15

### Preparation - [X] No one has asked for this feature before in other issues (even the closed ones) ### Describe the feature It's now faster to spin lotto boxes...

Improve performance of `parse_from_rfc3339`

4

It would be nice to have performance of `DateTime::parse_from_rfc3339` method match performance of `speedate::DateTime::parse_str_rfc3339` Naively looking at both implementations the difference seems to come from avoiding bounds checking and unrolling...

No target on Choices (2) for summer Shiki

5

### Preparation - [x] No one has asked for this feature before in other issues (even the closed ones) ### Describe the feature Should be easy enough to add a...