Sam Clegg

The patch LGTM. If you are OK with waiting for our own wasm-3.0 update (not sue how long that might be sadly) that might be best, since then it will...

It looks like the first commit where it started failing was https://github.com/WebAssembly/wabt/pull/2634.. which seems completely unrelated. So my guess is that something changes with the github CI infra of the...

@SoniEx2 would you have time to look into this? It looks like that the s390 stuff was addeding #2380 but this test started failing for some external reason.

Hey Eli! Long time now see. Hope you are doing well. Sadly, wabt is currently a little behind on reference types and GC proposals. It could be that fixing that...

> 👋 Sam, great to be in touch again. > > Yes, I noticed a general lag around GC-related stuff and other new things from WASM 3.0 > > Would...

Wow, this is very impressive that you got all this to work @feedab1e. My main concern is how much we want to actually commit to being able to express object...

> > Wow, this is very impressive that you got all this to work @feedab1e. > > My main concern is how much we want to actually commit to being...

> > Wow, a gcc backend! Thats is exciting! Are you sure it wouldn't make sense to use the `.s` format there, like the one that llvm uses? I assume...

> The problem with `.s` for me is that I would be relying on what is essentially an implementation detail of LLVM, a format which is undocumented, and implementation of...

> Well, that documentation would be nice in any case, but I suspect that someone from LLVM have to do it first before I can consider adopting `.s`, and then...