Sergey Torgashov
Sergey Torgashov
> But if we ever (for some reason) want to add another field to this class, then it become a problem. It's not excellent for binary-compatible evolution. Oh, good point....
> We need to completely get rid of it. We can't make it explicitly managed, because the only thing that changes is the return value, and there is no way...
@ruippeixotog just fyi: looks like this issue can be closed since the v0.23 is supported since pureconfig v0.17.0, isn't it?
> It would be nice to release also a version of pureconfig depending on http4s 0.22 in the meantime 🙏 Totally agree :) Would a PR with a new pureconfig-http4s-022...
@ruippeixotog thank you for looking into it. The thing is that there's quite a bit of projects around that still cannot that easy switch to Cats Effect 3 and hence...
Added a PR #1421 with a support for **http4s v0.22**, humbly hoping it makes some sense. cc @ruippeixotog @augi
@alexandru, to be honest I'm not so familiar with all that Futures zoo that Java provides. I faced a necessity to convert between `Effect` and `CompletableFuture` on my project and...
@alexandru, > CompletableFuture could then implement UnlawfulAsync. Do you mean that the conversion from some effect `F[_]` to `CompletableFuture` should look like the following: ```scala // assumes `UnlawfulAsync[CompletableFuture]` is in...
@alexandru, I'm thinking about your suggestion. It isn't clear to me how you're going to use `UnlawfulAsync`. I'm trying to imagine: let's say I have some `F[_]` and `implicit unlawfulAsync:...